🔐 1.75ms NIST Auth • PQC + FHE • 115-515x vs DIY • 29-34x vs SEAL
📜 15 Patent Claims Pending
1.75ms. NIST-compliant quantum-resistant auth.
"If You're Not Quantum Resistant in the Next Few Years, You're Out of Business" Why? →
NIST-Compliant in 1.75ms. Or 650µs if you need speed. What's NIST? →
DIY with SEAL + liboqs + ZK + biometrics? 200-900ms per auth. We're 115-515x faster. See the math →
Ship military-grade Quantum Resistant Encryption this afternoon.
One API call does it all—or customize for your own needs.
1.75ms
NIST Auth
650µs
Turbo
115-515x
vs DIY
29-34x
vs SEAL
128-bit
NIST L1
Blink Test: 300ms blink ÷ 1.75ms = 171 auths per blink. The only integrated PQC + FHE + Biometric provider.
What's Inside 1.75ms (NIST-Compliant) v4.0
NIST-compliant quantum-resistant authentication includes:
| Component | Time | % |
|---|---|---|
| PQC Layer (NIST Level 3) — 236µs | ||
| ML-KEM Encapsulate | 21.4µs | 1% |
| ML-KEM Decapsulate | 19.6µs | 1% |
| ML-DSA Sign (×2) | ~130µs | 7% |
| ML-DSA Verify (×2) | ~65µs | 4% |
| FHE Layer (NIST 128-bit, N=4096) — 1,436µs ◄ BOTTLENECK | ||
| FHE Encrypt (N=4096) | 1,070µs | 61% |
| FHE Compute (distance) | 133µs | 8% |
| FHE Decrypt | 233µs | 13% |
| Serialization — 75µs | ||
| TOTAL CRYPTO | 1,747µs (1.75ms) | 100% |
Optional Add-ons:
+ STARK audit trail: +1.5ms → 3.25ms total
+ Blockchain (Solana): +800ms → ~1 sec total
Blink = 300,000µs
300,000 ÷ 1,747 = 171 NIST auths per blink
Microsoft SEAL alone: ~50-60ms FHE → H33 is 29-34x faster
Measured on AWS c7i.4xlarge (16 vCPU, Intel Xeon Platinum 8488C). Criterion.rs v0.5, 100 samples. February 4, 2026 | v4.0.
full-stack-auth.js
// Ship quantum-resistant auth this afternoon
const result = await h33.auth.verify({
userId: 'user_123',
biometric: faceData
// NIST-compliant by default (1.75ms, 128-bit)
});
// Need more speed? One parameter.
const fast = await h33.auth.verify({
userId: 'user_123',
biometric: faceData,
mode: 'turbo' // ~650µs, ~100-bit
});